CoinTalk
A total of 2733 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
Bitcoin Banks: Why Nations Are Building Strategic Reserves
Key Takeaways:
- Michael Saylor argues that "Too Big To Fail" institutions must evolve into Bitcoin banks to survive.
- Nations can re-capitalize their crumbling balance sheets by adopting a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
- This shift represents a move from crypto anarchy to institutional adoption by global superpowers.
The concept of Bitcoin banks sounds like a contradiction. Bitcoin was invented to destroy the banking system so why would it want to join it? According to MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor the integration is not only inevitable but necessary for the survival of the legacy financial system.
In his vision the next phase of adoption does not involve buying coffee with Satoshis. It involves the largest financial institutions in the world becoming custodians of digital scarcity. He argues that Bitcoin is not a currency for spending but a superior form of capital for saving.
Why Do We Need Bitcoin Banks?
The global economy is currently drowning in debt. Fiat currencies are losing purchasing power at an alarming rate due to inflation and money printing. Saylor posits that traditional banks are holding melting ice cubes in the form of fiat currency.
By transitioning into Bitcoin banks these institutions can hold an asset that appreciates over time. This allows them to recapitalize their balance sheets. Instead of holding toxic debt they would hold the hardest asset ever discovered.
This offers a lifeline to the "Too Big To Fail" entities. If they embrace digital property rights they can protect their clients' wealth from debasement. If they refuse they risk becoming obsolete as capital flows elsewhere.
What Is a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?
This theory extends beyond corporations to nation states. The idea of a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" suggests that governments should print their local currency to buy Bitcoin. This creates a national savings account that grows faster than the national debt.
We have already seen smaller nations like El Salvador pioneer this model. Now in 2026 the conversation has moved to G7 nations. The race is on to see which superpower will be the first to officially accumulate digital gold.
Saylor compares this to the Louisiana Purchase. It is a moment where a government can acquire a massive amount of valuable land (in this case digital land) for a fraction of its future value.
How Does This Change Custody?
For Bitcoin banks to work custody is king. Saylor argues that most people do not want to manage their own private keys. The risk of losing a seed phrase or getting hacked is too high for the average investor.
He believes the future involves a tripartite system. You will have self-custody for the purists. You will have centralized custodians like BYDFi for traders. And you will have massive institutional banks for generational wealth preservation.
This allows Bitcoin to scale to billions of users. Not everyone needs to be their own bank but everyone needs access to the asset class.
Is This Good for Decentralization?
Critics argue that Bitcoin banks threaten the ethos of crypto. If BlackRock and JP Morgan hold all the coins does Bitcoin lose its soul?
The counter argument is that Bitcoin is permissionless. Anyone can hold it. If banks want to buy it they are free to do so just like anyone else. Their participation drives up the price which rewards the early adopters and secures the network with trillions of dollars in value.
Conclusion
The era of Bitcoin banks marks the final maturation of the asset class. It is moving from the fringes of the internet to the center of the global balance sheet. Whether you are a nation state or an individual the strategy remains the same: accumulate the scarcest asset in the universe.
You do not need to wait for a government mandate to start your reserve. Register at BYDFi today to buy Bitcoin on the Spot market and secure your own financial future.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can banks seize my Bitcoin?
A: If you hold your assets in a custodial bank they technically can. This is why many users prefer self-custody or non-custodial solutions to maintain total control.Q: Why does Saylor dislike spending Bitcoin?
A: He views Bitcoin as property (like a building) rather than currency. You do not spend your house to buy coffee; you hold it for 100 years.Q: What happens if the US creates a Bitcoin reserve?
A: It would likely trigger a massive global supply shock known as "hyper-bitcoinization" as other nations rush to buy before the supply runs out.2026-01-26 · 10 days ago0 096Crypto YouTube View Counts Sink to 2021 Levels, Decline Not Just Driven by X
Crypto YouTube Viewership Hits Multi-Year Lows as Retail Interest Fades
Crypto-related content on YouTube has entered one of its quietest periods in years, with viewership dropping to levels not seen since the early days of 2021. The sharp decline, observed over the past three months, is being widely interpreted as a clear signal of weakening retail participation and prolonged bear market sentiment across the digital asset space.
This slowdown is not limited to a single platform or algorithm change. Instead, it reflects a broader shift in how audiences interact with crypto media, suggesting deeper fatigue among retail investors and a structural change in market participation.
A Cross-Platform Decline, Not a YouTube Problem
Recent data shared by ITC Crypto founder Benjamin Cowen shows a steady collapse in crypto-related views across major YouTube channels when measured using a 30-day moving average. According to Cowen, the downturn mirrors a similar drop in engagement on X, making it clear that the issue extends beyond YouTube’s recommendation system.
Other creators echoed this view, noting that engagement has been sliding consistently since October. The pattern indicates that crypto social interest has not merely dipped but has entered territory typically associated with full bear market conditions.
Several analysts argue that, from a social engagement perspective, crypto never truly recovered its 2021 momentum. Despite price rallies in later years, audience attention and enthusiasm failed to return to previous highs, leaving content creators struggling to regain lost visibility.
Why Retail Investors Are Pulling Back
One of the most cited reasons behind the decline is retail exhaustion. Many long-term content creators have admitted that, while their channels continued to grow after 2021, the level of attention and excitement has never come close to what was seen during the previous bull cycle.
The constant wave of speculative altcoins, failed narratives, and pump-and-dump schemes has taken a toll on retail confidence. For many viewers, crypto content has become associated with losses rather than opportunity, leading them to disengage entirely rather than continue chasing uncertain trends.
This fatigue has been amplified by the growing perception that markets are no longer driven by everyday investors. Instead, institutional capital appears to be setting the pace, leaving retail participants feeling sidelined and disempowered.
Institutions Take the Lead as Retail Steps Aside
The collapse in crypto content viewership reinforces a broader theme of the current market cycle: institutions are increasingly dominant. Large players are deploying capital quietly, focusing on infrastructure, regulation-compliant products, and long-term positioning rather than hype-driven narratives.
Meanwhile, retail investors have either reduced their exposure or shifted their attention elsewhere. Some have turned toward macroeconomic assets such as precious metals, while others are simply waiting on the sidelines for clearer opportunities.
This shift explains why price action alone has failed to revive social interest. Without widespread retail participation, even significant market movements struggle to generate the same level of online engagement seen in previous cycles.
A Tough Year for Crypto Performance
Market performance has also played a role in dampening enthusiasm. Bitcoin’s performance over the past year has disappointed many retail investors, especially when compared to alternative assets. In contrast, commodities such as gold, silver, palladium, and even niche metals have outperformed, attracting capital that might otherwise have flowed into crypto.
For content consumers, returns matter more than narratives. As some observers have pointed out, investors are no longer interested in stories about potential future gains; they want tangible results. When those results fail to materialize, attention naturally shifts away.
Signs of Stabilization Beneath the Surface
Despite the gloomy outlook for crypto content creators, not all indicators are negative. On-chain analytics platforms have noted a gradual improvement in social sentiment surrounding Bitcoin. While overall engagement remains low, the tone of discussion has become less pessimistic, suggesting that the worst phase of capitulation may be passing.
Analysts emphasize that key psychological price levels will play an important role in determining whether retail confidence can recover. Holding above critical thresholds could help stabilize sentiment, even if viewership does not immediately rebound.
Ethereum, however, presents a more fragmented picture. Discussions around ETH remain scattered, with no clear narrative dominating social platforms. This lack of consensus reflects broader uncertainty about the asset’s near-term direction.
What the Decline Really Means for Crypto Media
The collapse in YouTube views does not necessarily signal the end of crypto interest but rather a transition into a quieter, more selective phase. Audiences are becoming more cautious, more experienced, and far less willing to engage with speculative hype.
For creators, this period may require a shift in strategy toward deeper analysis, macro context, and long-term education rather than short-term predictions. For the market itself, the absence of retail noise could eventually lay the groundwork for a more sustainable recovery.
Until then, crypto YouTube remains a reflection of a market still searching for renewed confidence, fresh narratives, and a reason for retail investors to return.
Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi
2026-01-15 · 21 days ago0 096Make Your Crypto Work For You: The Simple Guide to DeFi Staking
Unlock Your Crypto’s Hidden Earning Power: A Beginner’s Path to DeFi Staking
Watching your cryptocurrency portfolio sit idle can feel like a missed opportunity. While long-term growth is the goal, what if your digital assets could work for you right now—generating rewards while you sleep? Welcome to the world of DeFi staking, the gateway to earning passive income in the innovative proof-of-stake ecosystem.
Forget the complex, hardware-heavy world of mining. Staking offers a streamlined alternative, allowing you to participate in blockchain security and transaction validation simply by committing your coins. It’s a system where your crypto holdings can actively contribute to the network’s health while putting rewards back into your wallet.
Your First Steps into Staking: Simplified
Getting started is less daunting than it seems. Centralized platforms have smoothed the path, making your first stake only a few clicks away.
Imagine beginning with a platform like Coinbase. After creating and verifying your account, you fund it with either cryptocurrency or traditional money. The real magic happens when you choose a coin built for staking—like Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, or Toncoin. With a few more clicks, you commit your chosen amount. Your assets are then securely locked, beginning their journey of earning rewards. When you’re ready to access them again, a simple unstake initiates the process, though it often requires a short waiting period—a small trade-off for the yields earned.
For those craving more autonomy and choice, the advanced path leads to Web3 wallets and direct interaction with decentralized protocols, opening a vast landscape of staking opportunities.
Beyond Basic Staking: The Rise of Liquid and Restaking
The innovation in this space moves rapidly. Acknowledging the liquidity challenge of locked assets, the industry created liquid staking. This lets you stake your crypto and receive a tradable token in return, freeing your capital to explore other ventures within Web3 without sacrificing your staking position.
Then comes the cutting-edge concept of restaking. Pioneered by platforms like EigenLayer, this strategy supercharges your earnings. It allows you to take assets already staked on a primary network (like Ethereum) and redeploy them to secure additional protocols, layering rewards upon rewards. It’s a powerful tool for maximized yield, though it introduces a more complex risk profile that demands careful consideration.
Why Stakers Are Flocking to Proof-of-Stake
The吸引力 is clear and compelling. Staking transforms your portfolio from static to dynamic, generating consistent returns that often range from 4% to 20% annually. You’re not just earning; you’re becoming an integral part of the blockchain’s security infrastructure. This journey is accessible to anyone, removing the high financial and technical barriers of traditional mining. For many, it also unlocks a voice, granting governance voting rights that shape the future of protocols. All this happens while your underlying assets retain their potential for capital appreciation—a powerful combination of income and growth.
Navigating the Staking Landscape: A Clear-Eyed View of Risks
The promise of passive income is powerful, but a wise investor enters with eyes wide open. The decentralized frontier is not without its perils.
Your assets interact with smart contracts; vulnerabilities in their code can be exploited. The rules of the game can change through protocol governance, sometimes to a staker’s detriment. Validators face slashing penalties for misbehavior, which can impact those delegating to them. The darker corners of DeFi harbor risks of exit scams and rug pulls, where projects vanish with user funds.
For those providing liquidity in pools, impermanent loss is a key concept—a temporary reduction in value compared to simply holding assets, caused by market volatility. Finally, the liquidity lockup inherent in most staking means your assets are committed for a set period, limiting your ability to pivot quickly in fast-moving markets.
The Final Verdict
DeFi staking represents a fundamental shift in how we interact with digital assets, turning them into active, productive tools. It democratizes network participation and opens a reliable stream of crypto-denominated yield. For the beginner, starting with a trusted platform offers a safe on-ramp. As confidence grows, the expansive world of decentralized protocols awaits.
The path forward is to balance the undeniable benefits with a respectful understanding of the risks. With knowledge as your guide, you can transform your idle crypto into a vibrant source of passive income, securing the networks of tomorrow while building your financial future today.
2026-01-16 · 20 days ago0 096Debt Snowball Method How Small Wins Lead to Big Financial Freedom
The snowball method is a popular debt repayment strategy where you focus on paying off your smallest debts first while making minimum payments on larger ones. Once the smallest debt is cleared, you roll the payment you were making on it into the next smallest debt, creating a "snowball effect" that accelerates your progress.
What Is the Snowball Method for Debt?
The debt snowball method is a repayment strategy where you focus on paying off your smallest debts first, regardless of interest rate, while making minimum payments on your larger debts.
Once a small debt is paid off, you roll that payment into the next smallest one , like a snowball rolling downhill and growing in size , It’s all about building psychological momentum.
Every small win motivates you to tackle the next one.
7 smart ways to use the debt snowball method and gain momentum toward financial freedom.
1- List All Your Debts from Smallest to Largest
The debt snowball method focuses on quick wins to keep you motivated. By knocking out smaller debts first, you free up money faster and build confidence. Think of it like building a snowball—start small and roll it until it becomes unstoppable.
Example:
- Credit Card A: $450
- Store Card: $1,200
- Personal Loan: $3,500
- Car Loan: $9,000
- Credit Card B: $11,000
Use a simple spreadsheet or free budgeting app to organize your debts.
2- Focus Only on the Smallest Debt First
Pay the minimum payments on all debts except the smallest one , then, put any extra cash you have toward that smallest balance. It could be an extra $50, or maybe you can sell unused items to find $200.
Why it works:
Paying off a debt gives you a psychological win. You see progress. You stay motivated. And motivation is crucial in debt payoff.3- Automate Minimum Payments to Avoid Late Fees
Late fees can kill your progress. Set up automatic payments on every debt (except the one you’re attacking) to ensure you’re always on time.
This builds trust with creditors and protects your credit score—even while you work the snowball method.
4- Roll Over Payments After Each Win (The “Snowball Effect” in Action)
Once you pay off that first debt, take the amount you were paying and apply it to the next smallest debt.
Example:
- You were paying $100/month on Credit Card A.
- After that card is paid off, you now pay $100 + $40 (the minimum on Card B) = $140/month toward Card B.
Every time you eliminate a debt, your snowball gets bigger. That’s the “snowball effect”—small progress that grows into massive momentum.
5- Cut Expenses and Increase Your Snowball Power
Want to supercharge your results? Look for small lifestyle tweaks that can give you more money to add to your snowball.
- Cancel unused subscriptions
- Cook meals at home more often
- Use cashback or rewards apps
- Pick up a side hustle or freelance gig
Even an extra $100/month can cut months off your debt journey.
6- Avoid New Debt While You’re in “Snowball Mode”
Nothing kills progress like swiping your card again after paying it off.
Lock your credit cards, remove them from digital wallets, or even cut them up if necessary. While you're using the snowball method, your goal is to reduce debt, not trade one balance for another.
If emergencies are your concern, build a mini emergency fund of $500–$1,000 alongside your payoff plan.
7- Track Your Progress (Celebrate the Wins!)
Keep a visual tracker—like a debt payoff chart or digital dashboard—to celebrate each time a balance hits zero.
Celebrate each win:
- Take a picture of the “$0 balance” screen.
- Share your progress anonymously in finance forums or groups.
- Reward yourself (in a small, budget-friendly way) with each milestone.
This keeps your motivation high and your focus sharp.
Final Thoughts: The Snowball Method Works Because It’s Human
If you're searching for “how to get out of credit card debt” or wondering about “the snowball effect in debt”, you’re probably tired of feeling buried.
Here’s the truth:
It’s not always about math. It’s about mindset.The debt snowball method gives you confidence, momentum, and clarity. It works because it speaks to human psychology—not just cold hard numbers.
And once the ball starts rolling, it becomes unstoppable.
You can visit the BYDFi platform to learn more about investments and successful ways to live a successful life.
2026-01-16 · 20 days ago0 096Deflationary Tokens: The Best Hedge Against Inflation?
Key Takeaways:
- Deflationary tokens have a supply that decreases over time, creating natural upward pressure on price if demand stays constant.
- This is the opposite of inflationary fiat currencies like the US Dollar, which lose purchasing power every year.
- Projects achieve deflation through buybacks, transaction fee burns, or halving schedules that reduce new issuance.
Deflationary tokens are the economic opposite of the money in your bank account. In the traditional financial world, central banks print trillions of new dollars every year. This increases the supply and lowers the value of every dollar you save.
In the crypto economy of 2026, investors are tired of losing purchasing power. They are flocking to assets that are programmed to get scarcer, not more abundant.
By investing in an asset where the supply mathematically shrinks, you are betting on the laws of supply and demand. If the pie gets smaller, your slice of the pie gets more valuable, even if you never buy another token.
What Makes a Token Deflationary?
A token is considered deflationary if its total circulating supply decreases over time. There are two main ways deflationary tokens achieve this.
The first is "Burning on Transaction." Some meme coins and DeFi protocols engage a tax (e.g., 1%) on every transfer. That 1% is sent to a dead wallet. The more people trade the token, the faster the supply vanishes.
The second is "Buyback and Burn." This is common with exchange tokens like BNB or MKR. The project uses its real-world profits to buy tokens off the market and destroy them. This links the success of the business directly to the scarcity of the asset.
Is Bitcoin a Deflationary Token?
This is a common point of confusion. Technically, Bitcoin is disinflationary, not deflationary.
The supply of Bitcoin is still increasing. Miners produce new coins every 10 minutes. However, the rate of inflation drops every four years due to the Halving.
Eventually, in the year 2140, Bitcoin will hit its hard cap of 21 million. Until then, while it is infinitely harder than fiat currency, it does not strictly fit the definition of deflationary tokens that actively reduce their supply today.
Why Is Ethereum Called Ultrasound Money?
Ethereum is the prime example of a modern deflationary asset. Since the EIP-1559 upgrade, the network burns a portion of the gas fees paid for every transaction.
During bull markets when network activity is high, the amount of ETH burned is often higher than the amount of new ETH paid to stakers. This results in a "Net Deflationary" issuance.
This narrative, dubbed "Ultrasound Money," suggests that ETH is superior to "Sound Money" (Gold/Bitcoin) because the supply isn't just capped; it is actively shrinking.
What Are the Risks of Deflation?
While deflationary tokens sound perfect for investors, they can be bad for users. If a currency becomes too valuable, people stop spending it.
This is the "Deflationary Spiral." If you think your token will be worth 10% more tomorrow, you won't use it to buy coffee today. You will hoard it.
For a currency to function, it needs velocity (movement). This is why most deflationary assets function better as "Store of Value" investments rather than day-to-day payment currencies.
Conclusion
In a world of infinite fiat printing, scarcity is the ultimate luxury. Deflationary tokens offer a mathematical shield against the erosion of wealth.
Whether you prefer the programmed burn of Ethereum or the buyback mechanics of exchange tokens, the goal is the same: Owning a larger percentage of the network without spending more money. Register at BYDFi today to build a portfolio of scarce assets and protect your future purchasing power.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Do deflationary tokens always go up in price?
A: No. Supply is only half the equation. If demand drops faster than the supply burns, the price of deflationary tokens will still crash.Q: How do I know if a token is deflationary?
A: Check the project's whitepaper or a tracker like "Ultrasound.money" for Ethereum. Look for terms like "burn mechanism" or "buyback program."Q: Is Ripple (XRP) deflationary?
A: Yes, slightly. A tiny amount of XRP is burned as a fee for every transaction on the ledger to prevent spam, slowly reducing the total supply over decades.2026-01-29 · 7 days ago0 095Bitcoin Searches and Social Buzz Fell in 2025 Despite Record Highs
Bitcoin Quietly Climbs While Online Buzz Fades in 2025
Bitcoin spent 2025 rewriting price history, yet something unusual happened beneath the surface. Despite breaking multiple all-time highs and surviving one of the most violent market crashes in recent memory, public attention toward Bitcoin weakened instead of growing. Search trends declined, social media mentions dropped, and online enthusiasm cooled, creating a striking disconnect between price action and public interest.
This paradox reveals a deeper shift in how the market interacts with Bitcoin, suggesting that maturity, not hype, may now be driving the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
Search Interest Slows After Post-Election Surge
Global Google Trends data paints a clear picture. Interest in the keyword Bitcoin surged dramatically following the U.S. presidential election in November 2024, when Donald Trump’s victory reignited speculation around crypto-friendly policies. However, that spike proved short-lived. As 2025 progressed, search volumes steadily declined, interrupted only by two modest upticks during the second half of the year.
This decline occurred even as Bitcoin moved through historic milestones. Prices climbed to new records, volatility dominated headlines, and institutional involvement deepened. Yet retail curiosity, as measured by search behavior, failed to keep pace.
Social Media Mentions Drop by Nearly a Third
The slowdown wasn’t limited to search engines. Data shared by Bitcoin cypherpunk Jameson Lopp revealed a significant decline in social media discussion. Posts on X containing the word Bitcoin fell by roughly 32% in 2025 compared to the previous year, totaling around 96 million mentions.
Activity peaked early in the year during moments of political and symbolic importance. The inauguration of President Trump, the pardon of Ross Ulbricht, and the announcement of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve all triggered temporary spikes in discussion. Beyond these moments, engagement gradually faded, even as Bitcoin touched price levels that once would have dominated global headlines.
Record Prices Failed to Reignite the Crowd
One of the most surprising aspects of 2025 was how little noise accompanied Bitcoin’s most dramatic price movements. When BTC surged past $120,000 and later printed a new all-time high above $126,000, social chatter remained subdued. Even Bitcoin Pizza Day, traditionally a major cultural milestone for the community, produced only a modest increase in online discussion.
This muted response became even more apparent during October. As a bullish narrative gained traction and Bitcoin reached fresh highs, social activity stayed unusually low. Then came the crash. On October 10, more than $19 billion in leveraged crypto positions were wiped out in a single event, yet online engagement failed to explode as it might have in earlier cycles.
Influential Bitcoin Voices Never Went Silent
While overall chatter declined, prominent Bitcoin advocates remained highly active. Media intelligence data shows that Strategy chairman Michael Saylor published over 1,200 Bitcoin-related posts during the year, the vast majority carrying positive or neutral sentiment. His consistent messaging reflected long-term conviction rather than short-term speculation.
Blockstream CEO Adam Back was even more prolific, posting tens of thousands of times about Bitcoin. His activity spiked during periods of heightened fear, including moments when concerns over quantum computing threats dominated the narrative. Meanwhile, Human Rights Foundation strategist Alex Gladstein focused heavily on Bitcoin’s role in personal freedom and financial sovereignty, keeping ideological discussions alive even as broader interest waned.
Bearish Sentiment Persists Into 2026
As 2026 began, sentiment indicators continued to show caution. Analytics from Santiment revealed that social commentary surrounding Bitcoin grew increasingly bearish in mid-January, even as prices rallied sharply during the same period. This divergence highlighted a market driven more by capital flows than public optimism.
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index echoed this mood, spending much of early 2026 in fear-dominated territory. Yet beneath the pessimism, subtle signs of recovery began to form. Data from CryptoQuant showed the short-term Fear & Greed moving average crossing above the longer-term average, a signal often associated with improving confidence and potential price strength.
What This Shift Means for Traders and Investors
The decline in hype does not necessarily signal weakness. Instead, it may point to a more mature Bitcoin market, one less reliant on viral excitement and more influenced by fundamentals, liquidity, and institutional strategy. For traders, this environment rewards discipline, risk management, and access to advanced tools rather than emotional decision-making.
Platforms like BYDFi have become increasingly relevant in this new phase. As sentiment fluctuates and volatility remains high, traders are turning to exchanges that offer deep liquidity, flexible trading products, and robust risk controls. BYDFi’s growing presence among global crypto traders reflects this shift toward professionalism and strategic positioning rather than hype-driven speculation.
A Quieter Bitcoin, But a Stronger One
Bitcoin’s journey through 2025 and into 2026 suggests that attention is no longer the primary fuel behind price movement. The crowd may be quieter, searches fewer, and timelines less crowded, but the network continues to grow, evolve, and attract serious capital.
2026-01-26 · 10 days ago0 095Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Unsubstantiated Myths, Says Professor
Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Built on Myths, Says Columbia Professor
As US lawmakers prepare to move forward with long-awaited crypto market structure legislation, a fierce battle is unfolding behind the scenes — and stablecoins have become the unexpected flashpoint. According to a Columbia Business School professor, the loudest objections coming from the banking sector are not based on evidence, but on fear of losing profits.
Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia and a well-known crypto educator, argues that much of the resistance to stablecoin yield-sharing is rooted in misinformation deliberately pushed to protect the traditional banking model. In a recent post on X, Malekan expressed frustration that progress on crypto legislation is being slowed by what he described as unsubstantiated myths surrounding stablecoin economics.
The Real Fight: Who Controls Stablecoin Yield?
At the heart of the debate lies a simple but powerful question: who should benefit from the interest generated by stablecoin reserves?
Stablecoin issuers typically hold reserves in US Treasury bills and bank deposits, which generate yield. Banks and their lobbyists argue that allowing issuers or platforms to share this yield with users creates a dangerous loophole. Their fear is that consumers, attracted by passive returns of around 5%, could pull billions of dollars out of traditional savings accounts, triggering a so-called deposit flight.
Malekan rejects this argument outright, calling it a convenient narrative designed to shield banks from competition rather than protect the financial system.
Why Stablecoins Don’t Drain Bank Deposits
One of the most persistent claims from the banking industry is that stablecoin adoption will inevitably shrink bank deposits. Malekan says this assumption ignores how the stablecoin market actually works.
Much of the demand for stablecoins comes from outside the United States. When foreign users purchase dollar-backed stablecoins, issuers are required to place reserves into US-based assets, including Treasury bills and bank deposits. Rather than draining the system, this process can inject new capital into American banks and government debt markets.
From this perspective, stablecoins are not a threat to deposits but a mechanism that can expand financial activity across borders.
Competition Isn’t the Problem — Profits Are
Another key myth, according to Malekan, is that stablecoins will cripple bank lending. In reality, stablecoins do not prevent banks from issuing loans. What they do is challenge banks’ ability to pay near-zero interest while earning substantial returns elsewhere.
Today, the average US savings account yields just over half a percent. If banks fear losing customers to yield-bearing stablecoins, Malekan argues, the solution is straightforward: pay savers more. Stablecoins introduce competition, not collapse.
Banks Are No Longer the Main Credit Engine
The argument that stablecoins could choke off credit also ignores a structural shift in the US financial system. Banks now provide only about one-fifth of total credit in the economy. The majority comes from non-bank sources such as money market funds, private credit firms, and capital markets.
These sectors could actually benefit from stablecoin adoption through faster settlement, lower transaction costs, and potentially reduced Treasury yields. Rather than weakening the system, stablecoins may enhance its efficiency.
Community Banks Aren’t the Real Victims
Much of the lobbying effort frames community and regional banks as the most vulnerable players. Malekan calls this another misleading narrative.
According to him, large money-center banks have far more to lose if stablecoins disrupt the status quo. Community banks are often used as a shield in public messaging, while the real objective is protecting the outsized profits of the largest financial institutions.
He describes the situation as an uncomfortable alliance between big banks defending their margins and certain crypto startups pitching services to smaller banks under the guise of protection.
Savers Matter Too — Not Just Borrowers
Public policy discussions often focus heavily on borrowers, but Malekan insists that savers deserve equal attention. Preventing stablecoin issuers from sharing yield effectively forces consumers to subsidize bank profits by accepting minimal returns on their money.
A healthy economy depends on both savers and borrowers. Blocking innovation that benefits savers simply to preserve existing profit structures undermines that balance.
Congress Faces a Choice: Consumers or Corporations
Malekan concludes with a clear message to lawmakers. The stablecoin yield debate should not be about preserving legacy advantages but about encouraging innovation and serving consumers.
He warns that many of the claims circulating in Washington lack empirical support and urges Congress to remain focused on progress rather than pressure from powerful lobbies.
Growing Pushback Against Banking Influence
The debate has also drawn reactions from legal and political figures. Lawyer and Senate candidate John Deaton recently reminded voters that senators are facing intense pressure from banking interests to prevent platforms like Coinbase from offering stablecoin rewards.
Deaton’s message was blunt: banks and career politicians do not necessarily act in the public’s best interest. He pointed out that restrictions on stablecoin yields could stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.
Coinbase has reportedly gone as far as warning that it may withdraw support for the CLARITY Act if lawmakers impose restrictions on stablecoin rewards beyond basic disclosure requirements — a sign of how high the stakes have become.
A Defining Moment for Crypto Regulation
As the market structure bill heads toward markup, the stablecoin yield issue may determine whether the US embraces a more competitive, consumer-focused financial system or reinforces the dominance of traditional banks.
2026-01-19 · 17 days ago0 095
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide